PARTICIPATORY MULTI-CRITERIA FLOOD VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT IN LOKOJA, KOGI STATE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65760/Keywords:
Analytic Hierarchy Process, Multi-criteria Decision Analysis, Flooding, Vulnerability, Participatory.Abstract
Lokoja has experienced a recurrent devastating flood event since 1994, causing deaths, displacement, and
billions in damages amid climate change and urban growth. Traditional top-down vulnerability assessments
often neglect local insights, limiting effective mitigation and adaptation efforts. This study employs the Analytic
Hierarchy Process (AHP) within a participatory multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework that
integrates stakeholder inputs with physical attributes (elevation, population density, land use, drainage
density, rainfall, slope, road density, and proximity to rivers) to develop a flood vulnerability map of
communities in Lokoja, Kogi State. The AHP weighted criteria results revealed order of importance of flood
vulnerability as proximity to waterbodies (0.25) > elevation (0.20) > rainfall = (0.15) = Drainage = 0.15) >
land used land cover change (0.12) > Road Density (0.07) > (Slope = 0.03) = (Population = 0.03). The
reclassified results revealed a low-vulnerability area of 1,164.24 km², a moderate-vulnerability area of
1,462.76 km², and a high-vulnerability area of 534.05 km², based on multi-criteria evaluation. Spatially, the
vulnerability map highlights west-to-east disparities, with high-risk zones concentrated near riverine areas.
This finding implies that areas near the river are highly vulnerable to flooding. The participatory MCA has
demonstrated its capacity to enhance vulnerability mapping, thereby supporting decision-making aimed at
reducing long-term vulnerability and livelihood disruption.